Walkaway. La Vida por Defecto

Walkaway. La Vida por Defecto

  • Downloads:2462
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2023-03-29 09:16:45
  • Update Date:2025-09-23
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Cory Doctorow
  • ISBN:841262002X
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Hubert Vernon Rudolph Clayton Irving Wilson Alva Anton Jeff Harley Timothy Curtis Cleveland Cecil Ollie Edmund Eli Wiley Marvin Ellis Espinoza (conocido por sus amigos como Hubert, etc。) era demasiado viejo para estar en esa fiesta comunista con su amigo Seth。 Pero el desmoronamiento de la sociedad moderna exige formas creativas de diversión y de protesta, a pesar de la violencia y la hipervigilancia policial。 Tras conocer a Natalie, una rica heredera que intenta escapar de las garras de su represivo padre, deciden renunciar por completo a la sociedad por defecto y marcharse。 Después de todo, si cualquiera puede diseñar e imprimir las necesidades básicas de la vida —alimentación, ropa, refugio— desde un ordenador, hay pocas razones para formar parte del sistema。 Sigue siendo un mundo peligroso, las tierras vacías destrozadas por el cambio climático, las ciudades muertas desmanteladas por la huida de las industrias, las sombras que esconden a los depredadores, tanto animales como humanos。 Sin embargo, las filas de los andantes, que han dejado atrás el mundo ultracapitalistas, no dejan de crecer。 Los centros de investigación ajenos al poder desarrollan entonces algo que los zotarricos no han conseguido nunca comprar。 Y la vida por defecto cambia para siempre。 Fascinante, inspirador y lleno de humor negro, Walkaway es un thriller de ciencia ficción multigeneracional que abre ventanas y arroja luz y propuestas ante los cambios fundamentales que viviremos antes de que acabe el siglo。

Download

Reviews

Samuel Cheshire

Revolutionary。 Brilliant。 The plot is compelling and the ideas relevant and prescient。 This is one of the most realistic and fascinating depictions of a near future I've ever come across, and I highly recommend it。 The style is refreshing and at times feels almost like you're having a conversation with the author。 Revolutionary。 Brilliant。 The plot is compelling and the ideas relevant and prescient。 This is one of the most realistic and fascinating depictions of a near future I've ever come across, and I highly recommend it。 The style is refreshing and at times feels almost like you're having a conversation with the author。 。。。more

Chris

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers。 To view it, click here。 It was interesting, but the three chapter lecture on anarcho-socialism, with no follow up on how they are going to achieve anything felt forced。 The book seems to use the movement as license to steal stuff and it actually makes the movement look really bad: and has more or less turned me off。 I would hope that real anarcho-socialists don't just steal stuff as often as this book depicts。 It was interesting, but the three chapter lecture on anarcho-socialism, with no follow up on how they are going to achieve anything felt forced。 The book seems to use the movement as license to steal stuff and it actually makes the movement look really bad: and has more or less turned me off。 I would hope that real anarcho-socialists don't just steal stuff as often as this book depicts。 。。。more

cherry

1 star- didn't like it。 Even considering audiobooks, this is probably the most confusing book I've ever pushed myself through。 There is limited worldbuilding in the beginning, as if the author assumes that you'll just latch onto the world based solely on your own assumptions and deductions of the little info given。 The characters are weirdly named, basic, and display little development in their relationships with each other。 The plot。。。 I have no idea what happened。 I'm also not a fan of the who 1 star- didn't like it。 Even considering audiobooks, this is probably the most confusing book I've ever pushed myself through。 There is limited worldbuilding in the beginning, as if the author assumes that you'll just latch onto the world based solely on your own assumptions and deductions of the little info given。 The characters are weirdly named, basic, and display little development in their relationships with each other。 The plot。。。 I have no idea what happened。 I'm also not a fan of the whole immortality/ resurrection idea, so this book just falls completely flat for me。 Longer, more specific review below。 All main points are in bold if you'd rather skim :)what I liked: -the diversity。 what I didn't like: -the beginning was too confusing, with little explanation of the world and the characters。 It was also slow to start; I was 100 pages in and only one major thing had happened。 -to me, it feels like there wasn't enough UNDERSTANDABLE world-building。 I wouldn't had known it was about computers being able to print everything we needed if the blurb hadn't said so。-I usually love dialogue-heavy books, but this dialogue was too heavy。 The characters had speeches that spanned pages and pages。 When it wasn't a speech, they would speak to each other ONLY in paragraphs (arguably, still a speech)。 Not only was it repetitive, but it was also boring。 -expanding on the dialogue- it felt stilted, stiff, unnatural, forced。 The characters were trying to preach their ideas and then got bogged down in them💀-FURTHER expanding on the dialogue: there were way too many acronyms in there。 I had no idea what half of it meant, and theywasn't explained。 HERFed? A ELUA? -and along those lines, there were so many words/ slang that I didn't understand and weren't explained。 I wasn't given the definition of a "zotta" until page 226, almost halfway through。 What's a "zepp bumbler"? I still don't know what "interface surface" is。-with all these aspects regarding the writing, I can't say I liked the writing style at all。 I ended up skimming a lot, and skipping whole pages when it was just monologue after monologue。-I couldn't connect to the characters。 They were boring and vague, and some weren't given any history at all。 You only get them as they are with no understanding of how they became who they are today。 -also regarding the characters, what is up with the weird ass names? Hubert, etc was an interesting name, but all the other names。。。 Limpopo? Why did she name herself that? What's the signficance, if there is any? Same with Iceweasel。 I cringed every time I read that。 And don't even get me started on Kersplebedeb💀-the plot was disjointed, confusing and a bit boring。 I already wasn't hooked since the beginning, and by the 150 mark, I knew it wasn't going to be great for me。 Some of it was just not believable- (view spoiler)[ "Iceweasel" getting invited to go into strangers' hideout to talk to their uploaded consciousness of a dead person, even though other people out in the world are trying to kill this group of strangers to get their hands on this tech? Why are they so trusting of her and why is she suddenly so special? Why does SHE trust THEM, for that matter? Why everything (hide spoiler)]。 -the immortality concept is not really one I support, and it drained me of motivation to keep reading。 I've written an entire article for school about why I don't like it and don't think people should be pursuing it, but to each their own I guess。 -the characters' romantic relationships were not developed at all, and I HATED how the author would imply that Character 1 and Character 2 liked each other, only to swerve and make Character 1 bang some other random character (case in point: (view spoiler)[ Hubert said he had a crush on Iceweasel and then went on to bang Limpopo。 (hide spoiler)])。 There was even cheating, which is a massive massive massive ICK。 ((view spoiler)[ Iceweasel was with Gretyl, but after getting freed by Nadia/ Nadine/ whatever the bodyguard's name is, she decides to bang the bodyguard。 Wtf? (hide spoiler)])-there was a careless comparison of a character's theorised action (not even real action) to bulimia, which I found insensitive (page 65)。 I don't think you should be making light of other peoples' mental health and health struggles。-speaking of careless comments, I also didn't like this one: "Limpopo's femininity made her too weak to grasp this。" I can't tell if that's said sarcastically or not but it reeks of sexism。-I also don't like this: "Zottas are the only people it's okay to be racist about。" First off, justifying racism is horrid。 Secondly, saying it's okay to be racist to people you don't like is atrocious。 Made me incredibly uncomfy。 。。。more

Charles Radway

Slow to develop。 Really good, in parts。 Thinking I might be aging out on some of the modern SF。 What happens when we never die?

John Hitchcock

A fascinating read, science fiction, about a logical end to the forces of greed and capitalism that are current in the world today。 Gruelling in places, hopeful in others, and a happy ending。 The author's philosophy come through in the dialogue, I found it interesting and collected some quotes for my future reference。 I have recently discovered Cory Doctorow from some of his other writings。 I recommend him to you。 A fascinating read, science fiction, about a logical end to the forces of greed and capitalism that are current in the world today。 Gruelling in places, hopeful in others, and a happy ending。 The author's philosophy come through in the dialogue, I found it interesting and collected some quotes for my future reference。 I have recently discovered Cory Doctorow from some of his other writings。 I recommend him to you。 。。。more

Jess

As a person with both Commune and Immortality fantasies, this book gave me a lot to think about。

Anna Scribner

It was lovely to read a book that was realistically utopian。 So much messaging nowadays is full of doom, and it is refreshing to see a perspective on a path forward, through a transitional period that of course would have to happen based on today's society。 Lots of interesting ideas and thought provoking discussion。 Maybe a bit cheesy at times, but maybe that's just my doom-and-gloom brain thinking that for something to be meaningful it has to be tragic。 Let me have my happy ending! It was lovely to read a book that was realistically utopian。 So much messaging nowadays is full of doom, and it is refreshing to see a perspective on a path forward, through a transitional period that of course would have to happen based on today's society。 Lots of interesting ideas and thought provoking discussion。 Maybe a bit cheesy at times, but maybe that's just my doom-and-gloom brain thinking that for something to be meaningful it has to be tragic。 Let me have my happy ending! 。。。more

Juan Sanmiguel

People walkaway with 3D printers and establish communities away from traditional society。 The powerful do not like and try to stop it。 Doctorow is questioning the traditional post-apocalypse story。

Mario

Dystopia meets utopia。We can learn a lot from Doctorow and his Walkaways。 And we should。

Jane

DNFThere's some funny stuff but OMG so preachy and pretentious。Maybe it got better but after listening to about a quarter of the audiobook I could not stand another minute。 I probably would not have gotten that far if Wil Wheaton hadn't narrated the beginning。 DNFThere's some funny stuff but OMG so preachy and pretentious。Maybe it got better but after listening to about a quarter of the audiobook I could not stand another minute。 I probably would not have gotten that far if Wil Wheaton hadn't narrated the beginning。 。。。more

Ashley

Where do I start with this? My opinion of this went back and forth more often than a politician's viewpoints during election time。 First off - what I enjoyed about the book:It's a unique concept。 I think considering the state of everything, the idea is something a lot of us have had。 Walking away from everything and living a minimalistic, nomadic lifestyle that's based in cooperation instead of capitalism。 The idealism of where technology will be in 50-70 years was fun the think about as they us Where do I start with this? My opinion of this went back and forth more often than a politician's viewpoints during election time。 First off - what I enjoyed about the book:It's a unique concept。 I think considering the state of everything, the idea is something a lot of us have had。 Walking away from everything and living a minimalistic, nomadic lifestyle that's based in cooperation instead of capitalism。 The idealism of where technology will be in 50-70 years was fun the think about as they use materials to recycle into 'feedstock' that can essentially be used to 3D print just about anything and everything。 It was fun to consider, albeit far-fetched。。。but then again, we thought of the Jetsons in the same way and here we are with a several things that they thought up too。 The fact that the rich just get richer is also something that is highly probable, with a new term for the 。001% of 'zotta' being coined specifically for them。 The parts that were engaging, were really engaging。。。unfortunately that part seemed to mostly be at the end, but that's just my feeling on it。 Also - Akron is kind of a big deal there。 When it's first mentioned, I had to see if there was an Akron in Canada or if they were talking about Ohio。 Sure enough, it was Ohio。 I have a soft spot for that city considering I have a lot of family there, so what happened to it was。。。unfortunate, but fascinating, since it seemed to be a cornerstone of motivations and ideologies after a certain point。 My list of complaints are far ranging, unfortunately。 First off, I'm a character development first/plotline second kind of person most of the time。 When this starts out, we're introduced to our first character, who we THINK is going to be the main protagonist。 But then instead of really doing anything with him, Cory was like "ehhhhh, I think I want to focus on the rich chick instead" and we're left wondering about our first guy。 Then after a good long portion of the book in which he's not even mentioned, it felt like Cory suddenly remembered him, didn't know what to do with him, and then decided to kill him without any fanfare。 Granted, that ended up playing into something down the road, but even then, it was minor。 It was similar for other characters other than rich chick。 She ended up being the focal point of the story because her schtick was "little zotta girl with the big bad zotta daddy wants to give it all up and walkaway in 70's anarchist punk fashion"。 I felt like she was really one dimensional and sort of boring。 I was more interested in the unofficial but reluctant leader of a walkaway group, Limpopo, or the researcher-turned-sim, Dis (who completely just disappeared at some point and it made me sad)。 None of the characters were particularly compelling despite their "deep and poignant" conversations。That brings me to my next rant。 There was a lot of jargon and phrasing that you just have to either ignore or muddle through and I felt like it was 2010 again and I was surrounded by infuriatingly pretentious hipsters。 Most of the conversations between characters involved a political-ethical premise where words were just sort of strung together to make a statement that can't really be argued against because it can't be translated into layman terminology。 The same thing went for any and all discussion and description of the programming aspect of things (and practically everything in walkaway is about programming)。 Perhaps I'm sensitive to this because being in the medical field, we're taught to not use jargon related to our profession when speaking to patients。 It's also the first rule of writing (in my head at least): Make everything easy to understand to everyone。 I'm not saying it has to be 5th grade level, but at least don't try to talk above the readers for the sake of your ego。 I know I'm not the only one complaining about this。 Honestly, a lot of this was a bit of a slog for me。 I really wanted to give it 2 stars, but the last chapter or two made me bump it up a bit。 I was thoroughly conflicted throughout reading it but the premise of it, more than the actual story line, is what made me keep going until the end。 。。。more

Chgehrig

could have used some actual narrative to bolster all the technical dialogue

Daniel Fitzgerald

Given such a depressing future, I am so excited for it!I don't think it will take 100 years to reach this world though - maybe 10?I feel I am a Walkaway-in-waiting, a techno-nomad searching for my tribe。 Given such a depressing future, I am so excited for it!I don't think it will take 100 years to reach this world though - maybe 10?I feel I am a Walkaway-in-waiting, a techno-nomad searching for my tribe。 。。。more

Gregg Kellogg

This was a fun exploration of a world breaking down that might be a prelude to Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom。 Reminded me of Burning Man with the Gift Economy and interesting contrast with the Reputation Economy, not to mention the end result of the income gaps were making worse every year。Nicely narrated and imagined。

Brendan

Interesting perspective on the transition to a post-scarcity society

Fatima

eine Utopie in verschachtelten Sätzen。 Die Handlung bewegt sich mir zu langsam voran。。。 Muss man mögen。

Garrett

I usually love Doctorow, reading one of his was a like a guarantee of mind-bending and often pulse-racing fun。 I did not love this。I have never before read a Cory Doctorow book I would describe as a slog。The pacing of this is odd - it starts off as a vintage Cory book, and then quickly veers into a territory where every 20 pages or so, there is a lecture-cum-argument about the internal philosophies of the book - Cory having arguments that he anticipates having someday in real life, gaming them o I usually love Doctorow, reading one of his was a like a guarantee of mind-bending and often pulse-racing fun。 I did not love this。I have never before read a Cory Doctorow book I would describe as a slog。The pacing of this is odd - it starts off as a vintage Cory book, and then quickly veers into a territory where every 20 pages or so, there is a lecture-cum-argument about the internal philosophies of the book - Cory having arguments that he anticipates having someday in real life, gaming them out before they can be consumed by coffee and regret? Expository lecturing in speculative fiction in a requirement, I get it - Asimov's Foundation books are essentially nothing but - but Scalzi and Jemisin and Chambers all do it better than this now, without letting it derail the action of the plot or, more to the point, the gravitas of the characters。 Both begin to erode under the endless assault of ideological bickering that takes place on what becomes a sadly predictable schedule within the book。Or maybe I'm just too old for this now? I don't need to be reminded that a character understands dysmorphia because that character is Trans, especially when that character has been here for a couple of hundred pages。 Let it be subtle。 I don't need every argument about why us being better to each other is *actually in our best interests* spelled out for me because I fucking know that。 A big net effect of this book was just to make me feel sad about my plugged-in location within the system as it is and my inability to escape my situation, geographically, politically, philosophically, and practically。 I get that from the fucking local news, there, Cory。I did like the mushy emotional human parts, the sex scenes were mostly weird, I'd have like more detailed desciptions of the tech and less bathing, and the transcendental humans-beat-death stuff was cool。 Big lacking question? Does a society with cloning allow a Trans person to adjust their genome to generate a body more in-line with their internal self? Good mecha action, too much needless suffering surrounding the violence。Yeah。 。。。more

Mary Stormhouse

Walkaway is Not an easy read。 But If you once let capture you, you cannot leave it。 There are lots of philosophical ideas inside, as well as exciting passages。Probably "the" defining Solarpunk novel i've read。 Walkaway is Not an easy read。 But If you once let capture you, you cannot leave it。 There are lots of philosophical ideas inside, as well as exciting passages。Probably "the" defining Solarpunk novel i've read。 。。。more

Steven Reiz

This is a brilliant story of a post-scarcity society that turns away from authority, with many people foregoing regular jobs and ambitions, instead turning 'walkaway'。 The story is full of big ideas and engaging, with many tense moments, good character development and impressive visions of a possible near future。 I found it particularly relevant because I see already increasing numbers of people turning away from a regular economy, be it through crypto, FIRE or other alternative career paths。 Th This is a brilliant story of a post-scarcity society that turns away from authority, with many people foregoing regular jobs and ambitions, instead turning 'walkaway'。 The story is full of big ideas and engaging, with many tense moments, good character development and impressive visions of a possible near future。 I found it particularly relevant because I see already increasing numbers of people turning away from a regular economy, be it through crypto, FIRE or other alternative career paths。 This goes hand in hand with increasing signs that productivity, at least in the west, has increased so much that post-scarcity is practically upon us, although not many seem to realize it。 At the same time I found the book a bit too long and repetitive。 The clear, engaging and visionary story is muddled by mixing in another technological development, that of brain scanning and uploading to computers, which in my mind was presented much too casually here, and is not something we can expect in the near future。 And then there is another tendency of Doctorow, present in many of his books, of casting all his stories in the light of a class struggle against 'The Man'。 Here this takes the form of persistent attacks against the walkaways, apparently arranged by the ultrarich ('zottas')。 There is no credible reasoning given for these attacks, or for the way in which for example the Canadian government would allow them。 In fact multiple times the author draws the parallel of refugee camps, and indeed paints the walkaways as practically indistinguishable from refugees。 I don't see any likely near future where western governments would condone organized attacks on refugee camps (perhaps the story should have been situated in Africa instead of Canada?)。 In the end I saw a strong parallel with Margaret Atwood's 'The Handmaid's Tale'; a dramatic and emotional story set in a near future that has turned dystopian, giving the impression that this is a likely and logical development, but a modest amount of rational thought shows that this particular near future is only reachable if a large number of powerful people suddenly, for no explained reason, all take the same turn to crazy。 Still recommended, it's a good read and I see anything that encourages us to think of possible post-scarcity near futures as a rare good。 。。。more

Manu

I like science fiction, but I absolutely love it when it gets into worldview and philosophy! Walkaway is set in a post-scarcity world, where anyone can design and print basic necessities - food, clothing, and even shelter。 And in this world, there are broadly three kinds of folks - the elite oligarchs, who as usual want power and the ability to bend the world to their rules, the 'default' who continue to abide by rules and work for a living, and the 'walkaways', who walk away from this default r I like science fiction, but I absolutely love it when it gets into worldview and philosophy! Walkaway is set in a post-scarcity world, where anyone can design and print basic necessities - food, clothing, and even shelter。 And in this world, there are broadly three kinds of folks - the elite oligarchs, who as usual want power and the ability to bend the world to their rules, the 'default' who continue to abide by rules and work for a living, and the 'walkaways', who walk away from this default reality。 They aren't walking away from society, but understanding that in the zotta (elite) world, they're problems to be solved, not citizens。 As more and more people decide to turn 'walkaway', the elite have a problem with the drastic social changes that follow。 The book follows three characters to begin with, who decide to become walkaways。 But then it opens out to a bunch of folks with varied perspectives on how individuals should live their lives, and how society should be built and nurtured。 The science fiction and the gizmo tech is terrific in itself - filled with ideas, and so is the plot with its twists and turns, but as I said earlier, what takes it beyond are the philosophical discussions between the characters。Funnily enough, these are usually between people who are on the same side。 This includes diverse topics - generational mindsets, the inevitability of technological advancements and its intrusions, quality and the measurement of merit and its relationship with equivalence - individual genius and the role of community, why happiness needs to be fleeting for survival, and so on。 And as the book progresses, it's interesting to see how even the building of utopia is a WIP, and has to undergo changes as generations change, new ideas emerge, and technology continues its advance。 With climate change, always-on surveillance, refugee crises, wealth disparity all having acquired more momentum, this is a fascinating speculation (if not prediction) of how it's going to play out, with a great representation of radically different worldviews, and a superb perspective on what a post-scarcity utopia could look like。 。。。more

Lisa

This was a really good one。 I liked the idea of people walking away from possessing so much and created a society (and the software that supported it) where resources are shared more。 When you don't want to use something anymore, it goes back to the general usage and everyone helps keep that categorized。 Sounds wonderful, really。 I feel like the no waste Facebook groups are a dim reflection of that。 Of course it can't be that simple because people are people and some of them can't play nice and This was a really good one。 I liked the idea of people walking away from possessing so much and created a society (and the software that supported it) where resources are shared more。 When you don't want to use something anymore, it goes back to the general usage and everyone helps keep that categorized。 Sounds wonderful, really。 I feel like the no waste Facebook groups are a dim reflection of that。 Of course it can't be that simple because people are people and some of them can't play nice and some can't stand that others aren't spending money with them and it all became an excellent story I enjoyed reading。 。。。more

Brooke

312:2022Meh。 DNF。 Edgy for edgy's sake。 Made it about 30% and gave up。 312:2022Meh。 DNF。 Edgy for edgy's sake。 Made it about 30% and gave up。 。。。more

Arne

Spannende, nahe science fiction, die vor allem aktuelle Ideen wie die der commons und technologische trends aufgreift。Mitunter leidet das Buch etwas an sehr langen Dialogen in denen die Beteiligten ihre Ansichten aufs genauste erklären, was irgendwie langweilig und schlecht wirkt。 Auch die zahlreichen popkulturellen Referenzen stören die Immersion doch irgendwie。 Ich weigere mich zu glauben, dass Menschen in hunderten von Jahren immer noch die gleichen Filme und Fernsehserien für Vergleiche ranz Spannende, nahe science fiction, die vor allem aktuelle Ideen wie die der commons und technologische trends aufgreift。Mitunter leidet das Buch etwas an sehr langen Dialogen in denen die Beteiligten ihre Ansichten aufs genauste erklären, was irgendwie langweilig und schlecht wirkt。 Auch die zahlreichen popkulturellen Referenzen stören die Immersion doch irgendwie。 Ich weigere mich zu glauben, dass Menschen in hunderten von Jahren immer noch die gleichen Filme und Fernsehserien für Vergleiche ranziehen。Trotzdem, eine spannende Dystopie und Utopie die einem noch einige Tage zu denken gibt! 。。。more

Justin Jayne

Oh man this one started out solid and just got rougher and rougher。 I'll go ahead and get the positives out of the way first。Pros: Solid world-building with a believable timeline。 It's a little hard to picture some of the tech in your minds eye but it's explained well enough that you get it。 There's a lot of great talking points this book brings up and fun characters along for the ride。 I'm sure I'm leaving stuff out but it's because I'm so distracted by the--Cons: Where to begin? A lot of the d Oh man this one started out solid and just got rougher and rougher。 I'll go ahead and get the positives out of the way first。Pros: Solid world-building with a believable timeline。 It's a little hard to picture some of the tech in your minds eye but it's explained well enough that you get it。 There's a lot of great talking points this book brings up and fun characters along for the ride。 I'm sure I'm leaving stuff out but it's because I'm so distracted by the--Cons: Where to begin? A lot of the dialogue and slang is just straight up ripped from gamer and internet lingo from like 2013。 This may be the most times I've heard the word "pwn" or "noob" since I was in Modern Warfare lobbies in middle school。 Speaking of dialogue, all the characters talk like they just finished a philosophy course and want to discuss it with a student a year above (or below) them。 It's just not how people talk and I can't imagine our current state of argumentation shifting that much in 50 years。 There's also a lot of really prolonged and descriptive sex scenes。 While I'm not one to say that that kind of content shouldn't exist, it's egregious to the point of me needing to bring it up。 There's lots of lesbian sex which is especially weird as this is written by a man but more specifically it's just weirdly unnecessarily sexualized。 Show me a chapter that isn't horny in this book and I'll tell you you're reading the acknowledgements。 There's a prominent character who meets a woman with big titties who is described as "looking like the characters x drew in high school。" It's just weird fantasy shit like that in most cases。 And finally, there's a really awkward time jump before the bloated final chapter of this book that just kills all it's momentum because then Doctorow has to explain what's happened since the last chapter which ends on a really interesting new road the book hasn't quite gone down。 And also the epilogue feels really tacked on and kills any meaning the "ending" was supposed to have。 I could talk about my problems with this book all goddamn day。 2。5 stars。 。。。more

Mathew Ingram

Loved this -- very plausible near future story, and some great characters

JS

So much future-speculative fiction introduces an interesting idea, discusses it a little bit, and then that's it。 But Walkaway introduces idea after idea, and doesn't just discuss it but follows through on the positive and negative outcomes, and how they give rise to the next idea。 I thoroughly enjoyed this fraught but optimistic take on what our unfolding journey to the near future might look like。 I hope Doctorow is at least partially right, because it sounds like a future I'd want to live in。 So much future-speculative fiction introduces an interesting idea, discusses it a little bit, and then that's it。 But Walkaway introduces idea after idea, and doesn't just discuss it but follows through on the positive and negative outcomes, and how they give rise to the next idea。 I thoroughly enjoyed this fraught but optimistic take on what our unfolding journey to the near future might look like。 I hope Doctorow is at least partially right, because it sounds like a future I'd want to live in。 It sounds like a future I want to help build。 。。。more

Beth Filar Williams

I wanted to like this more, but very techno future I'm not as keen on & hard for me to keep up。 Liked parts。 Unique aspects too。 Slow read slow uptake for me。 I wanted to like this more, but very techno future I'm not as keen on & hard for me to keep up。 Liked parts。 Unique aspects too。 Slow read slow uptake for me。 。。。more

Jacob Jason

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers。 To view it, click here。 I love the overall idea of the book and I love how surprisingly emotional the book is。 The science stuff is quite heavy but it helps the story move forward。 The characters are very well written。 I really like the story feeling like it could happen within a few years I know I daid the science stuff is heavy but the way it was written if sounded like its well thought and very plausible。 Overall a very good reading experience。4/5

ALICIA MOGOLLON

I can't really say what I loved about this book with spoiling it。 I mean it's packed with Cory Doctorow superb ability at making science and technology super exciting as well as his interesting and often relatable characters。 There were only a few things I didn't like one the stupid detailed descriptions of sex I'm not against sex but hearing about other people's sexual encounters just bores me especially the characters I can in no way relate with。 The other thing is I feel like the book could h I can't really say what I loved about this book with spoiling it。 I mean it's packed with Cory Doctorow superb ability at making science and technology super exciting as well as his interesting and often relatable characters。 There were only a few things I didn't like one the stupid detailed descriptions of sex I'm not against sex but hearing about other people's sexual encounters just bores me especially the characters I can in no way relate with。 The other thing is I feel like the book could have been so much better with more action and a lot less blather。 I mean he coukd drop at least a hundred pages of man/wombsplaining and lost nothing。 。。。more

Serge

Interesting concepts and food for thought。 Not sure this particular utopian vision is for me and I doubt technology could ever actually get to the point it's at in the plot (though it's still more realistic than, say, Star Trek)。 I did enjoy very on-point criticism of where society seems to be headed, historically and currently。 I had to pause now and then to digest new ways of looking at things - which is to me the definition of what good sci-fi must do。 Overall a quick and easy read, and hard Interesting concepts and food for thought。 Not sure this particular utopian vision is for me and I doubt technology could ever actually get to the point it's at in the plot (though it's still more realistic than, say, Star Trek)。 I did enjoy very on-point criticism of where society seems to be headed, historically and currently。 I had to pause now and then to digest new ways of looking at things - which is to me the definition of what good sci-fi must do。 Overall a quick and easy read, and hard to put down once you get into it - not sure what other reviewers got stuck on - and I've read plenty of things that were a slog。 The book does split into several parts with a lot of time in-between and switches point-of-view between multiple characters, but that just gives you the capability to see changes over time without needing a whole series。 。。。more

tpg0

As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can provide some information about the book "Walkaway。 La Vida por Defecto。" "Walkaway。 La Vida por Defecto" is the Spanish translation of the science fiction novel "Walkaway" written by Cory Doctorow。 The book was published in 2017 by Planeta Publishing Group and translated by Luis G。 Prado。 The storyline of the novel takes place in a futuristic society where people can "walkaway" from the traditional social and economic systems and create their own utopian communities。 However, these communities are threatened by powerful corporations and governments, challenging the characters to fight for their freedom and rights。 The book has received positive reviews for its thought-provoking themes and characters, including its exploration of capitalism, private property, and the importance of community。 Overall, "Walkaway。 La Vida por Defecto" offers an engaging and relevant perspective on our current society and the possibilities for a better future。

tpg1

As an AI language model, I cannot offer personal opinions on books。 However, 'Walkaway' is a science fiction novel written by Canadian author Cory Doctorow, which explores the concept of post-scarcity society and the possibilities of radical anti-capitalist resistance。 The Spanish edition of the book is titled 'Walkaway。 La Vida por Defecto' and has received positive reviews from readers and critics alike。

tpg2

I'm sorry, as an AI language model, I cannot provide an opinion on a specific book or any subjective matter。 However, I can describe the book for you。 'Walkaway。 La Vida por Defecto' is a Spanish translation of the science fiction novel 'Walkaway' by Canadian author Cory Doctorow。 The novel is set in a near future where the rich control everything, and the poor struggle to survive。 It follows a group of people who choose to "walk away" from society and build their own utopia based on sharing and compassion。 The novel explores themes of political upheaval, social inequality, artificial intelligence, and the power of community。